Sorry such a long time to respond to this thread, I wanted to clarify in detail why I stated that Organic Certifications are not all they are cracked up to be. I was away on the road watching the thread unfold and simply did not want to do this on my mobile.
Regarding safety/toxicity:
As has been touched on in good detail by Phoenix already; Organic Certifications do not actually entail chemical analysis of the end products. In some cases like GOLS labeling it would be required to know that no SBR rubber or other kind of synthetic polymer material is in the final mix, interestingly enough if GOLS wanted to know this information they would need the product tested by a polymer specialist like say ECO-Institut.
Most people associate the term Organic with it somehow meaning the product is safe. Safety is an issue of the chemical content of the product, and the chemical content of a product needs to be quantified by a lab qualified to do the testing, so with different standards and different criteria we have testing available say by Oeko-Tex, Eco-Insitut, or C2C, even Certi-PUR (which is strictly for polyurethane foams to my knowledge). Without knowing the chemical content of something to a high degree of certainty it seems silly to label something organic as being safe just because organic methods are practiced. This may sound like a crazy analogy but perhaps it would be possible to get some Organic Opium grown on Organic Poppy Fields in Afghanistan. So while I am not in anyway implying that organic certified products are somehow un-safe I just want to make a clear distinction here.
There is a common myth that if a molecule is found in nature it is healthy, my above example shows this not to be the case. If we can synthesize the same molecule in a lab it is technically identical to that found in nature. The toxicity level of any substance lies in the dosage. The word toxin gets thrown around like a buzzword these days on all sorts of media and while its no laughing matter the level of danger to general public is likely overrated. Take for instance a specific chemical that is used in many products 'formaldehyde' or aldehydes (many different ones). It is used in many adhesives, it is also used as a fire retardant chemical in certain applications, it sounds nasty. But here is the thing...we also produce formaldehyde in our own bodies just in small amounts. The human body has the ability to rid itself of this chemical, it is true that if the levels of formaldehyde in our body become too high it becomes toxic but again it is the dosage that determines this. Now where this stuff maybe *could* be an issue for some people is that I can imagine a common scenario in which someone just moved into a brand new home, they have new paint, new carpets, new underlay, new mattress, new chair in the corner, closed in space like a bedroom that doesn't get a lot of airflow, all of these things releasing various VOC's in higher amounts due to recently being made this probably isn't the healthiest air someone could be breathing in. So I don't want to make light of this subject, just shine a little light on it.
There are companies that make claims that their products are VOC free, there is no such thing. That is an un-scientific claim. If we read actual lab test results for VOC's it is usually shown what the 'detection-limit' of their equipment is. This may be listed as PPM (parts per million) or PPB (parts per billion). So if the machine has a detection limit of 200PPM (and they all have detection limits) they cannot say for certain that this particular VOC does not exist, just that it is below the detection limit. Based on the known effects of various VOC's the level of the VOC's then has a safety limit where they know that below another threshold these chemicals pose no threat. Organic certifications again simply do not carry out these kinds of tests. It simply has to do with processing or 'cross-contamination'.
Commonly it is believed that organic farming means absolutely no pesticides used in production. I am sure there are farms and farmers that do not use pesticides or herbicides of any kind however this is simply not guaranteed by most organic certifications. USDA Organic farmed produce actually does commonly use pesticides on the crops, they simply have a restricted list of approved pesticides for production. Maybe this is a good thing but in the interest of transparency and that's really what these certifications are supposed to be about it seems to be that this is somewhat misleading to the public based on common public belief for what organic actually means.
Consider also the fiscal cost of these programs, I am sure many of us have gone to a local farmers market and bought 'organically' grown produce from local farmers that do not have a certificate for the product but insist they have been growing it such a way for decades, maybe a small farm that cannot justify the cost of pursuing a certificate. To be fair its not that the certificate magically makes their produce any healthier after obtaining this. Now of course some of these people might also be lying, but there is ultimately a point where you are going to have to trust someone and make a buying decision. Consider the cost of Radium to build an entirely new Talalay production facility where they exclusively handle the organic raw latex so they can get this specific certificate. Who is going to bear the cost of this expensive new facility? The consumer will, the cost is always ultimately falling on their shoulders. Now consider the fact that GOLS independently does not test the finished product for VOC's and actual chemical content analysis. Imagine going through this massive expense and then actually hiring a lab to test both of their natural talalay latex foams only to find virtually no difference in the actual chemical content of one versus another. Again knowing that it is the chemical content itself which is supposed to make some difference in our apparent safety as the consumer. Where does the buck stop? To me a lot of this obsession is creating a form of phony bureaucracy that is over complicating the process of building safe and high quality products for people that ultimately is raising the price.
So I am all for organic certifications in the interest of transparency, but even then this can be on somewhat murky ground depending on who is doing the certifying. And while I agree that there are a lot of people in the public that care about these things, its based on good intentions and emotional appeal, not always a full understanding of how chemistry works. Due to a lack of general scientific literacy I feel that these certifications are indeed overrated. There are a lot of companies and organizations cashing in based on fear mongering tactics by making people afraid for their own health and safety. And while I advocate for chemical safety I just feel that marketing behind this needs some oversight. Please bear in mind that our business carries almost exclusively natural products many of which have various organic certificates. I have more to gain from fear mongering than 99% of businesses that exist I just think its a greasy underhanded tactic to use fear to drive sales. We promote natural materials in mattresses based on performance and function and a better nights sleep which there is legitimate science to back up these kinds of claims. We feel that it is a bonus that our products do contain less VOC's than the norm but that should not be the main focus. I would argue that to me personally I would rather a fair trade certificate that guarantees no child labor and fair prices to the workers is much more important than an organic certification as there is actually a proven benefit to this. C2C in this case actually covers this aspect much more thoroughly than any organic certification and they require some thorough chemical analysis which automatically gives this certificate more credibility.